Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

While true, I think it was illustrating the "damned if you do, damned if you don't" approach HN takes to Google in general.


Personally, I have no idea why people are so upset about WebM and AV1 and etc. Like sure, they're not necessarily God's gift to AV, but they're reasonable enough, and patent unencumbered. Google may be awful, but that doesn't mean the incentives can't align. I can tell you that my incentives are perpendicularly aligned with MPEG-LA's in this situation, so...


> HN takes to Google in general

Not exclusive to HN. Humans just have different opinions.


But HN moderators usually seem to upvote the complaints over the kudos.


You can't please everyone when your service is used by half of the world's population.


Well, Google invades our privacy. Google holds its users hostages to money. I am glad that HN is doing its job to stop Google.


Hostages? I'd say Google is better than most regarding data portability, assuming that's what you're referring to, offering 'takeout' for just about everything.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: