Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Hypothetically: if an audience is paying for your digital content or paying to support you on Patreon, they could instead pay for your content through crypto - if they are so willing and have it at their disposal. Aside from the lower fees you’d also be your own payment processor - more resistant to censorship, less platform lock-in, ability to self-host your content.

Same applies to selling digital assets on Bandcamp or running a Kickstarter campaign.

If your audience is unwilling to pay for your content or support you financially, and unwilling to pay a platform fee like with Netflix, then you might be stuck with monetizing through ads.



But that’s merely cryptocurrencies, not NFT. What does NFT bring to the table that just using cryptocurrencies doesn’t?


In a Bandcamp-like platform, the NFT would be a proof of purchase. When a user purchases your digital NFT album, they can at any point sign a message to get a link to the MP3 or FLAC files.

In a Patreon-like and Kickstarter-like platform the NFT might be used just the same, as a proof of purchase to access special content. Or, it could be used as a token or badge of appreciation, such as for being the first patron or a 1-year-continuous patron. The same way GitHub profiles show achievements and who the user is sponsoring.

In digital art platforms NFT is as it is already being used: certification and scarcity.

There’s other applications like streaming payments with vesting schedule:

https://github.com/ourzora/faucets




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: