Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I've done some cost analyses between our AWS and DC infrastructure.

To come up with our on-prem compute costs, we baked in the cost of power, real estate, staff, taxes, network infrastructure, servers (both in-use and in reserve), etc. On the AWS side, we used 3 year RIs and Savings Plan. After all that, there was around a 30% cost advantage on-prem. That's non-trivial, but not as big as one might think.

Outbound networking, however, is ludicrously cheaper on-prem. It's about 85% cheaper on-prem than in AWS. Bandwidth is not expensive outside the public cloud.

In fact, egress volume is the #1 cost driver for us moving a service on-prem or building it there to begin with. Some of the AWS managed services are also very pricey, but nowhere near the egregious markup of egress bandwidth.



85% cheaper seems little. In my case (collocation) bandwidth is 95% cheaper (i.e AWS is 20x as expensive) than AWS.


A quick question.

Have you also included:

  - storage costs (equivalent of EBS, S3 and Glacier) and
  - cost of analytics pipelines (equivalent of EMR, Athena, SageMaker, ...)
in the above price comparison?

Would you have some insights there? Thanks.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: