Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Even for actors that I personally believe to be evil, I like to have more evidence than "there is this dude who was paid not to published, trust me".


I would say that Big Food hiring food scientists to specifically tune the flavor profile of mass manufactured foods to never trigger satiation so that people would not stop eating them even when they are mechanically full is pretty evil.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/food-cravings-engineered-by-i...

Add in that most food doesn't taste like real food anymore and is engineered to make us crave more:

https://www.vox.com/2015/7/30/9070255/dorito-effect

And you have a perfect recipe for evil.

Big food came into existence thanks to scientific advancements that enabled the world to meet the needs of its population, and that's a good thing. Fertilizers and industrial agriculture has been a massive boon to most of the world, but allowing companies that have private shareholders to commandeer the ship and start steering it in a way that best benefits those shareholders over the best interests of the rest of the world has, in my opinion, created a system that has turned a great good into a perfidious evil.


Okay, but what has that to do with Big X suppressing a diet that cures Crohn's disease?


Sometimes the need to "win" an argument can come second. The story here is about corporate greed. I can easily imagine a team meeting where someone brought up the research and people knew it might hurt sales even if it turns out that its not replicable or anything. No one probably said "lets buy it out so people won't be cured", I assume it was an innovation manager pitching "we can make a new supplements formula based on the nutritional value of this diet". Business people agreed, knowing its a win-win. Next agenda item.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: