If you're openly associating with pedophiles, you're not somebody someone should entrust the safety of their children to. Period.
The head of content moderation's personal interests are way off-center. This does not paint them as someone with a good sense of what is moderate.
All of this is literally intuition, but we're being trained over time to ignore it in the name of sex-positivity and other nonsense. It's just grooming redefined.
> If you're openly associating with pedophiles, you're not somebody someone should entrust the safety of their children to
Retweeting art does not imply any knowledge of the "pedophilia". Also, "pedophile" is a term so general it's sometimes applied to things like finding people aged 17 attractive (which is the majority of heterosexual men). As far as I know the artist in question might just have liked some hentai that had a japanese schoolgirl in at some point. At that point the levels of indirection in your Law of Contagion are absurd even by the standards of believers in majiks!
> The head of content moderation's personal interests are way off-center. This does not paint them as someone with a good sense of what is moderate.
This would be just as accurate if the moderation head had an interest in gay sex.
> All of this is literally intuition
And your intuitions aren't anywhere near as strong as the intuitions of the 70s parents who made sure gay men weren't anywhere near their children. Should we have followed those intuitions too?
The head of content moderation's personal interests are way off-center. This does not paint them as someone with a good sense of what is moderate.
All of this is literally intuition, but we're being trained over time to ignore it in the name of sex-positivity and other nonsense. It's just grooming redefined.