DuckDB doesn't need an equivalent to litestream, it already have parquet files a... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		safehell on May 11, 2022 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: I'm all-in on server-side SQLite DuckDB doesn't need an equivalent to litestream, it already have parquet files and object storage support.

nojvek on May 12, 2022 [–]

That’s not a streaming replication though. So apples to oranges comparison.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact