We weren't born yesterday. We all know that you can massage the data, or redefine terms to produce any conclusion you want.
It's really easy to see Twitter's bias: just look at the propaganda they put in the search page, or look at their employee donations [1], or the Twitter profiles of their employees, or remember in support of which candidate they censored a news story. [2]
> The exact posts to which Twitter users are exposed in their news feeds might differ due to the recommendation algorithm, which is not available via Twitter’s programmatic interface.
And there we go, so they have discovered that without the recommendation algorithm (i.e. roughly the chronological timeline), what you see is what you follow. And that's supposed to be evidence against Twitter's political bias.
> We find strong evidence of political bias on Twitter, but not as many think: (1) it is conservative rather than liberal bias, and (2) it results from user interactions (and abuse) rather than platform algorithms
It's really easy to see Twitter's bias: just look at the propaganda they put in the search page, or look at their employee donations [1], or the Twitter profiles of their employees, or remember in support of which candidate they censored a news story. [2]
[1]: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/twitter-employees-democrats...
[2]: https://nypost.com/2022/04/26/elon-musk-says-suspending-ny-p...