Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That’s the 0BSD. I called it the Free Public License when submitting to OSI, but we changed it to 0BSD because Landley had apparently come up with the same license a few years before me.


Thanks for this. 0BSD has been my default license since I discovered it. My only issue with the MIT license was the requirement for attribution, which always seemed like an unnecessary pain. 0BSD fixes that.


Can you post the FPL text? I am wondering whether it was literally the same license.


It’s the same text, which is just the ISC license sans the “ provided that the above copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies” clause.

The only differences:

- I didn’t use the “Copyright Boaty McBoatface 2022” line, but that’s not a big enough change to justify having two licenses.

- The license was approved as the FPL-1.0.0, which I believe was the first OSI-approved license that user semantic versioning. This isn’t necessary, but I was mildly excited about it.

- The 0BSD doesn’t actually inherit from any other BSD license, the “BSD” bit is more of a spiritual nod that I found more confusing than helpful.


> The 0BSD doesn’t actually inherit from any other BSD license, the “BSD” bit is more of a spiritual nod that I found more confusing than helpful.

Don't tell Rob Landley that (the creator of the license). He is quite adamant that he used a BSD license as the basis.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: