If that attempt was a serious one it would be an actual legally binding contract.
But it's not. And the sellers know this because it allows them to scam more money out of people.
Yes, the idea is to have a legally binding contract that assigns ownership to whomever controls the token.
If that attempt was a serious one it would be an actual legally binding contract.
But it's not. And the sellers know this because it allows them to scam more money out of people.