You're now arguing against a proposition which doesn't exist and wasn't made.
Goalposts have been moved.
The goal, however, stands.
Anyone in the least familiar with Smith's works, would be aware of his discussion on differentiation in wages. It's actually a useful discussion, with solid points though with divergence from empirical evidence, and including only a subset of sources of personal wealth. It would make for a more useful further discussion than ignoring responses and changing the subject.
