I don't mean ubiquitous. I know what ubiquitous means. Latin wasn't ubiquitous in Rome. A thing of culture isn't ubiquitous. If anything it was transparent. Perhaps you should read about the era under observation before attempting to summarise/reinterpret?

Perhaps you should attempt to substantiate your nonsensical claim?

Perhaps you need a dictionary?

I don't. Perhaps you do? Are you unable to substantiate your nonsensical claim?