You could start with the article itself. I read it (well skimmed some parts). It looks like an honest attempt to assess Plandemic spread and understand the marketing strategy. There is an interesting claim about the deliberateness of the marketing, which led me to two questions:
1.) If the thesis is correct and the strategy was indeed as coherent as claimed, how did the authors learn these techniques?
2.) If the thesis is not correct, to what extent was the success due to serentipity?
Returning to my original point this does not seem like an attempt to promote disinformation.
That's a low quality sub if I've ever seen one. Most comments on the few posts i opened devolve into name calling, refusal of anything not fitting the commenters narrative, etc. Anything passes as "sources".
