Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Wouldn't this mean that Pulumi has better coverage than CloudFormation?

Some things in the AWS API aren't (yet) available in CFN.



It would mean Pulumi has better coverage than CFN and terraform. Indeed as their blurb states, Pulumi would have 100% coverage.

But I'm skeptical.


afaict the aws terraform module tends to have 100% coverage. i've never found a resource that didn't work, or didn't already have some way to use. i was able to deploy eks when it was still in beta through terraform, while i think the cloudformation stuff for eks lagged behind like almost by a year.


The terraform AWS provider lags from time to time too. I remember waiting the best part of a year for API gateway websockets support.

https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/issues/7...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: