Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Anyone who argues this is a conspiracy theorist making statements not based on actual evidence.


I don't think there is any conspiracy either.

What theory would you use to explain the evidence which shows that lifestyle recovery of many consumers which had come almost within reach, by less than 1 percent, never did actually arrive and has been moving back beyond reach faster than 1 percent for a while?

Everyone knows that 1 percent is less than 2 percent so it has to be some other explanantion besides "that's not nearly as bad as 2 percent".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: