Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Irrelevant question. This isn't about private business relationships, it's about a non-profit organisation entrusted with sole authority over public infrastructure.


And this is an important distinction because?

He’s been denied accreditation for his business to resell certain domains, not kicked off the internet.

Would it not be reasonable for, e.g. a publicly owned national electricity grid to refuse to accredit a new energy business which is run by someone who previously published “how to circumvent your electricity meter”? I don’t even know if such a thing would be illegal to publish, but even if it isn’t illegal, I don’t think it’s unreasonable for accreditation to be refused.


> I don’t think it’s unreasonable for accreditation to be refused.

It would not just be unreasonable, for a rehabbed offender, but also stupid. The people who know the ins and outs of systems are the ones best placed to suggest improvements to the status quo. I wouldn't think this necessary to be explained on Hacker News, but here we are.


> rehabbed

This is the core of my question C -- Is it reasonable to judge someone's current trustworthiness by what they say about their past actions?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: