Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A number of companies have asked for popcount to NOT be included in the base spec for B (certainly Zbb for embedded), because of the expense of implementing it vs the relatively small speedup it givesfor quite specialized use-cases.

Of course popcount will have an opcode allocated and binutils and gcc will (already do) know how to use it if it is present, so anyone who wants/needs it can implement it.



A "number of companies" have asked to have the instruction set degraded because they have code that fails to use it?

Ignorance, or corruption?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: