> There is NO WAY (ZERO!) that Mail-In Ballots will be anything less than substantially fraudulent
Translation: 100% certainty that Mail-In Ballots are substantially fraudulent
Where do you get the 2% from?
> Maybe he thinks 2% is “more than substantially”
We don’t know what he thinks - we know what he wrote. And he didn’t write a “maybe 2% chance of fraud”
He specified a 100% certainty of substantial election fraud
> There is NO WAY (ZERO!) that Mail-In Ballots will be anything less than substantially fraudulent
Translation: 100% certainty that Mail-In Ballots are substantially fraudulent
Where do you get the 2% from?
> Maybe he thinks 2% is “more than substantially”
We don’t know what he thinks - we know what he wrote. And he didn’t write a “maybe 2% chance of fraud”
He specified a 100% certainty of substantial election fraud