Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As it should be, with a fact check (at least if the fact is demonstrably false).

"Debates" (insofar as that concept even exists on a platform like Twitter) started on false grounds should not be allowed to continue.

If I make a claim "A, therefore B, therefore C", and A is demonstrably false, I'm not going to insist we keep discussing B and C for the sake of not "ending the debate". I should be forced to either concede or find a new line of reasoning.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: