The problem with those reasonable-sounding complaints is that the first paragraph is so out-there. I guarantee you that far less than 30% of HN is in favor of this. You're grossly overestimating the appeal of your posts.
You're also assuming that people are downvoting and flagging based on disagreement alone, which is incorrect. Many downvotes and flags are because they identify a comment as flamebait or otherwise guideline-breaking. I personally downvote and/or flag many comments that I agree with (i.e. that are on 'my' side of an issue), because I disagree with how they're using HN. Similarly, I upvote many comments that I disagree with, if they're following the guidelines and are interesting contributions. A lot of HN users use the site like this—enough to counteract a lot of downvotes-for-mere-disagreement.
So if your comments are being routinely downvoted and flagged, you'd do better to consider how you might not really be using HN as intended, rather than just blaming "mainstream narrative believers".
You're also assuming that people are downvoting and flagging based on disagreement alone, which is incorrect. Many downvotes and flags are because they identify a comment as flamebait or otherwise guideline-breaking. I personally downvote and/or flag many comments that I agree with (i.e. that are on 'my' side of an issue), because I disagree with how they're using HN. Similarly, I upvote many comments that I disagree with, if they're following the guidelines and are interesting contributions. A lot of HN users use the site like this—enough to counteract a lot of downvotes-for-mere-disagreement.
So if your comments are being routinely downvoted and flagged, you'd do better to consider how you might not really be using HN as intended, rather than just blaming "mainstream narrative believers".
By the way, I hope you saw my invitation to you about the game you wrote about here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22842351. See the final paragraph in my reply.