Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

We teach them every detail of everything they need to know in their technical school when they come into the military.

Old equipment is actually interesting to work on -- difficult, but interesting. It's also very valuable for understanding modern hardware at a deep level that isn't often taught anymore.

How many people do you know who have actually replaced and aligned the heads on a UYH-3 or run end to end tests on serial data channels that traverse thousands of feet and multiple switchboards from a UYK-43?



> How many people do you know who have actually replaced and aligned the heads on a UYH-3 or run end to end tests on serial data channels that traverse thousands of feet and multiple switchboards from a UYK-43?

I think that's interesting and valuable on its own from an academic/research/nostalgia perspective, but not when we're talking about maintaining systems critical to the functioning of a nuclear weapons arsenal.


Perhaps you're responding to a different discussion?

Read my comment in context and it will become quite clear.


UYK-7 maintenance... fault code lists and swap cards... love those days underway.


I missed the UYK-7 by a couple of years. But I lived the 43 and Q-21 for years.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: