Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A couple of my friends went to a restaurant together in the US. One of them paid with card, the other friend paid the first friend back by sending him a transfer by PayPal or Venmo, I cannot remember which. The amount was around $10-$20. The description said Persian restaurant or Iranian restaurant, because that's the kind of restaurant they had gone to. The transfer was blocked and the transfer amount remained in frozen state for over a year.

Ask anyone from one of the countries sanctioned by the US, like Cuba or Iran. This kind of experience is not new and it is not an exception. I no longer get surprised, just more and more disappointed.



OFAC lists are no joke, you will go to jail for disregarding it.


The name of an ethnic restaurant has nothing to do with the corresponding country, legally speaking. That's just a stupid software glitch.


Nah, you think the guy doing this is working that hard?


Then he ought to be fired.


American workers are scared of being perceived as anything else other than a YES MAN. The guy being told he has two-three days to implement OFAC can't say NO or they'll find someone to replace him that will say YES so he'll implement the shortest answer that causes that 'feature' to be marked as 'complete'


Even a random Excel geek would know that a "name" field is not the place to go for OFAC implementation. Or at least, not for a restaurant. I'm sure that they can link to corporate and banking data.


It doesn't really matter what someone knows, what matters is the payoff matrix:

Apply OFAC blacklisting extremely overly aggressively ... suffer an insignificant number of pissed off customers (who probably don't even leave you because everyone else is also awful).

Apply it as non-agressively as you think the law permits, or somewhat more than that... and find out that you're facing criminal charges because a prosecutor thinks the line was slightly different where you thought it was.

The situation is made more complicated in part because if prosecution isn't aggressive there are enormous sums of money ready to flow through whatever loophole exists and plenty of _bankers_ happy to help guide clients in blacklisted places through them. [ https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/09/business/standard-charter... ]




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: