That's preposterous. A lot of times you need an assertion in order to gather evidence. To make an assertion and then immediately dismiss it because there is no evidence would be a criminals dream come true.
> A lot of times you need an assertion in order to gather evidence
it's not an assertion then, it's a hypothesis. in any case,
i think you may have misunderstood what i was tring to say: imagine if i'd said: "i've seen evidence that hillary clinton reports to the chinese/korean government. no proof, but still". it says nothing, doesn't mention the evidence i've seen, and yet seems to imply something "wrong".
i'm calling it out, because it it encourages belief without evidence. it's insidious.
I'm not calling for or encouraging belief. I'm skeptical of the claims myself.
I want to see if the allegations are true and I support further investigation to bring all the details to light, because they are quite alarming. I don't support any narrative other than the truth.
I posted out of curiosity, because I wanted to see if others could contribute more to the discussion.
Meanwhile you have people that are flagging stories like this for an unknown reason, which is frustrating.
