It is most likely over simplistic, although I guess it would be nice for an explanation of why the down-votes happen.
I like to believe that I didn't try to personally attack anyone just try to show that they've been sued for Libel dozens of times, with 97% of them thrown out/dismissed.
The above Wikipedia entry makes it sound like the libel case was a one time deal painting him guilty on all videos when in reality it was a one time story he got wrong.
Not saying this guy speaking about google is credible or true, just trying to point out that if you win 97% of your libel cases there is more truth to their investigations than what the initial wiki entry made it seem.
Self-pity? Nah I could care less whether this guy is right or wrong, just trying to point out that everyone is painting him in a negative way and maybe it wouldn't hurt to look at the other side.
I like to believe that I didn't try to personally attack anyone just try to show that they've been sued for Libel dozens of times, with 97% of them thrown out/dismissed.
The above Wikipedia entry makes it sound like the libel case was a one time deal painting him guilty on all videos when in reality it was a one time story he got wrong.
Not saying this guy speaking about google is credible or true, just trying to point out that if you win 97% of your libel cases there is more truth to their investigations than what the initial wiki entry made it seem.
Self-pity? Nah I could care less whether this guy is right or wrong, just trying to point out that everyone is painting him in a negative way and maybe it wouldn't hurt to look at the other side.