>This sort of thing is more expected to come from a sensationalist magazine, and not from the official communication channel of the highest-office in the land.
This is the office that tried to push "alternative facts" as a rationale for the disagreement between Trump's claims of the size of his inauguration crowd and the photographic evidence. I mean, you lived through the same election cycle as everyone else. We saw the crazy train coming from miles away and for some reason the American people decided to board it.
Not only should this sort of thing be expected, it's apparently the sort of thing people wanted.
This is the office that tried to push "alternative facts" as a rationale for the disagreement between Trump's claims of the size of his inauguration crowd and the photographic evidence. I mean, you lived through the same election cycle as everyone else. We saw the crazy train coming from miles away and for some reason the American people decided to board it.
Not only should this sort of thing be expected, it's apparently the sort of thing people wanted.