Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> better qualified candidates in the pipeline

Probably the ones that read the spec and delivered what was required. If you're going to gloss over something trivial, what does that say about your attention to detail?



Alternatively, it's someone that wrote a solution, re-validated it against the spec, realized it was not fully correct, and was able to correct it within the deadline given. Hiring isn't yet a science.


Orn someone who wrote a massively over engineered spaghetti mess instead of wrapping a block of code in a loop control.


Silver lining: people make mistakes. Especially under stress. You don’t want to work with a group that thinks we are machines.


Perhaps, but if you're given 20 minutes to do something you can do in 2, are you sure you should be making mistakes?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: