Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Only about half of those voting the general election voted in the primaries. The other half (far, far more than the margin that Trump won over Clinton by) had yet to make their choice known by then.

Further, if Sanders had gotten the Democratic nomination, the debates, issues, and media coverage would have been far different, perhaps even swaying those who had wound up casting an anti-Clinton vote by voting for Trump to instead vote for Sanders.

One other thing to keep in mind that the turnout for Trump may have been much smaller had his opponent not been Clinton.



> ...swaying those who had wound up casting an anti-Clinton vote by voting for Trump...

Why do people only seem to consider TWO candidates. There was a third on the ballot to be considered. I wonder if these people did that at all.

Note: My point only is did they consider the third candidate. Not that they should have voted for him.


Because, like it or not, there are not enough Americans who will vote outside party lines to give any third-party candidate a chance of winning.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: