Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Most nutritional claims are based on pretty thin evidence and even more scant data.

The climate researchers are able to dig back literal millions of years and chart their findings.



> The climate researchers are able to dig back literal millions of years and chart their findings.

sorry, this is pretty funny. Do you know what the data those charts of millions of years are based on? models based on thin evidence and scant data. We are talking like 10 ice cores and 5 trees will swing the data wildly.

I am not a denier (CO2 causes some warming!) but this comment was kinda funny.


I'm surprised you're being down voted.

Remember the "global warming hiatus" that happened over the past 15 years? The one that most climate scientists accepted? Well, it looks like the models we're wrong. Tweak a few model input and "oops!" it's actually been warming the last 15 years.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: