Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | zgeor's commentslogin

Silicon chips are made of sand

Is uBlock working with the latest Chrome version? Mine got disabled automatically, and I had tonmove to uBlock lite


Why not switch to another browser instead that doesn't violate your privacy?


Firefox has been my main driver for many years, but I still have to use Chrome from time to time


I'm using Brave for those occasions


you could simply enable it back.


no you can't. and even if you keep it, it's not going to run.


for a limited time.


Amazon has owned goodreads since 2013.I have been using thr platform for many years, and the service has been good. Having said that, I haven't seen much innovation being built but that might be a good thing with this product.


> Congrats on being the NPC who pre-ordered iOS 18.2.1 "Midlife Crisis Edition" but still uses "Mobile Safari" unironically.

I cried a little, this is too good.


I dont think it is a full equivalent, but https://github.com/continuedev/continue seems close enough. It is quite ergonomic.


Not to mention that there is incentive to keep having oncall pages, because that's how you get paid. Or not participate at all. On the other hand, with a flat payment, there is a big incentive to prevent issues and not have(reduce) ooh incidents, and participate in the rota.


They don't compete right now, but surely the architecture of the system will be quite similar, or solve very similar types of challenges. So it should become easier to jump domains when these solutions mature.


This seems completely wrong.

A legal wrapper will use domain specific legal expertise to structure and develop their product and functionality. It will likely have many functions that are specifically optimized for the legal use case.

If a wrapper can easily move across many domains, then the wrapper likely adds little value to the base model.


It's nice of Spotify to at least leave the names of the songs.

Years ago I had several huge music video playlists which today stand at 80% of what they previously were.


YES! It's so unbelievably annoying when websites just remove stuff from your playlists / bookmarks / whatever without telling you what was removed.

For anyone stuck in this situation and willing to spend a few (many) hours to recover the titles of their YouTube playlist: On the playlist page, in the (...) menu there is a "Show unavailable videos" button. After clicking that, you can right-click all the unavailable videos and copy their URLs. Then you can either try the wayback machine, or google the video ID. Usually you will find some forum posts talking about the video and mentioning the title.

Of course, it's not guaranteed that you'll find anything this way. But I have recovered multiple playlists this way.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: