Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ybloviator's commentslogin

[citation needed]

(not in a snarky way, I want the story!)



not at all weird for him


Yes! It was so huge in the ISP space back then because trying to run something like NNTP on Linux at the time was just not a great experience for customers. Indy ISPs aren't really a thing these days I guess, but back then it was a really strong market for FreeBSD.


And I think the userland got a bit of a refresh from current FreeBSD when OS-X came out.


With heavy use in Netflix's CDN resulting in something like more than 15% of internet traffic being delivered by FreeBSD, that's some kind of success I imagine.


monoculture is bad, especially for security


I thought 3.x was the bumpy one (first SMP, IIRC).


I'm not a security guy, but monoculture always scared the shit out of me.


(on linux)


If anyone wants to learn (as opposed to arguing), the papers on Netflix's TLS offloading work are a fun read.

And say what you will, something like 20% of all internet traffic has a FreeBSD endpoint. And doing 400Gb/s of encrypted streaming from one box is quite an accomplishment.

I would argue the reason someone like Netflix or any of the other large orgs using FreeBSD come there is for the simplicity/cohesiveness. If you're looking to do something like in-kernel TLS or something, way easier on something smaller, documented, and with an OS devel team that will likely incorporate your work in future releases.


>And doing 400Gb/s of encrypted streaming from one box is quite an accomplishment.

It is amazing. I keep following their work from 100Gbps, 200Gbps, 400Gbps and now looks like 700Gb/s [1]...... woah

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30061718


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: