S3 is a widely supported API schema, so if you need something on-prem, you use these.

But what's the point to use these DIY object storage systems, when they do not provide durability and other important guarantees provided by S3 and GCS?

When you want just the API for compatibility, I guess?

Self-hosted S3 clones with actual durability guarantees exist, but the only properly engineered open source choices are Ceph + radosgw (single-region, though) or Garage (global replication based on last-writer-wins CRDS conflict resolution).

I'm not sure the type of person who imports such a vehicle would have the appropriate amount of foresight to let such a law affect their behaviour.

You'd be surprised to see people can't be classified meaningfully based on how much their car weighs.

And the admin should probably use the automatic setting. There is a feature request for a user preference when not logged in.[1]

[1]: https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/30193

There are floating platforms as well if the water is too deep for stilts.

ah! ty

Sounds like it does not favour mega-corporations at least then? That sounds like a desirable outcome to me.

The line between a language and a dialect is far too murky for this rule to be of any use.

It works fine for me, and has been for at least 2 years, between any subset of 2 laptops (KDE, WiFi), one desktop (KDE, LAN), and two Androids (WiFi). They're all on the same subnet though.

That's not true, it's just that the Chinese NCAP is modeled after the EU one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-NCAP

I've been running my self-hosting stuff on Netcup for 5+ years and I don't remember any outages. There probably were some, but they were not significant enough for me to remember.

German home improvement/hardware store chain Hornbach does that.[1] They still run ads though, quite aggressively.

[1]: https://www.hornbach.de/services/die-hornbach-dauertiefpreis...