Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tramGG's commentslogin

Paranoid or not, why would I trust a potential competitor with the centralization and management of all my information?


The reason to be cautious is because they could raise prices or cancel your contract at their will. But as long as you are able to change providers by the time the current contract expires (which can be several years for large corporate clients), you're fine.

A reason not to use AWS as a competitor of Amazon is that you wouldn't want to give them cash they can invest in their other business lines.


I got rid of my phone for 3 years and my employer (between failed attempts at startups) was appalled that I would even consider this. They became irate but eventually acquiesced. It's weird how much people can't understand how others don't want their addiction. This doesn't happen with heroin, or other drugs, just technology.


$255 for a keyboard? Wow. What are the more higher end keyboards you've seen?


It's $255 and doesn't come with any switches from what I can tell. Not the person you're responding to but I've heard good things about the UHK: https://ultimatehackingkeyboard.com/


I didn’t like it, despite waiting a couple of years (I think) for mine to ship.

The lack of Esc is just plain stupid and needlessly “special” for a hackers keyboard, especially with zero space constraints. The keys themselves I’m not a fan of, but that’s because nothing beats the buckling spring keys I’m used to - so not counting that against them. Build quality is great, however.


Can't you remap one of the other keys to be escape - I think for those who care keyboard layout is highly personal - I can find somebody has designed a keyboard that looks great and then make layout choices I find very strange. But if the keyboard uses qmk then I can easily fix that.

If you're not happy then build your own - or buy a unicomp board and replace the controller so you get the best of both worlds - buckling spring and programmable keyboard.


I have the UHK, I really like it (it is so far the best keyboard I've used). I could make use of another row of keys, but they chose to minimize size, which makes the keyboard nicely portable (especially if you put the two halves together back-to-back).

A big part of the appeal of the UHK is the agent, which lets you configure the keyboard any way you want. Not all keyboards let you do this, so it's often an apples to oranges comparison.


That's not much for a high-end keyboard. Spend some time browsing http://reddit.com/r/mechmarket/ . You can pay north of $1K if you want to, especially on a rare board; new ones are commonly around $500. Just one recent example: https://zealpc.net/collections/custom-keyboards/products/gb-... .


That’s nothing when you venture into the world of Korean custom keyboards. ~$500 for the case (usually milled out of quarter-inch thick aluminum with a solid brass weight) and PCB. Then add switches and custom key caps.


I have a Keyboardio Model 01: https://shop.keyboard.io/

The Kickstarter version cost $250, they go for $329 now. It's really comfortable, and I use the palm-switch and thumb keys very naturally.


VE.A2 is probably $500 or $400 at least now


cancel the debt, and move towards free colleges.


Not unless the budgets of these schools are brought under control first. A pipeline of seemingly free money is at least partially responsible for creating the current mess. Making it "free" with no restriction on how much will be spent on "free" is going to lead to even more runaway growth in the cost of providing education.


They could easily set a limit based on headcount, similar to public schools. The only problem I see with that is people purposefully defunding the system and turning it into a bigger bureaucratic hell like many public schools have become.


I paid off my student loans. If people who didn't pay off their loans get forgiveness, I should be entitled to a refund.


Can I add my mortgage debt to this please? I want in on the free stuff too!


Now sure why you are downvoted. This is by far the best option.


yeah, weird right?


Yeah the producthunt head nod was weirdly out of place. It's rife with faked/influenced votes and gives little penetration to actual users.

If you want users just find the people who have the problem you're trying to solve.


It comes down to innovation. I bought iPhones because they were innovative. People aren't buying new phones because there is little marginal utility in upgrading anymore.

We can break the innovation opportunities down into several areas:

1. Hardware

2. Operating System

3. Software/Apps

Hardware hasn't been innovated. The closest thing we got was the hope of a modular phone that was bought for the patents (?) and killed inside of google. The best thing we get is better cameras, biometrics, and screen resolution. Not many people care about cameras (not including selfies), biometrics is sort of a lame duck (who needs their face constantly scanned? or fingerprints as passwords for everything), screen resolution doesn't anymore because the screen size is so small -- majority of people play easy games, like LoL, PUBG, and Candy Crush clones.

Operating system experience is converging on features between iOS/Android to the point they are really indistinguishable.

Software is limited because of hardware specs, walled gardens, and the learning curve -- but much more nefariously I software devs might just be afraid if they build something cool these companies would just turn around and steal it/bake it into the OS.

Alternatively we could see adoption start moving horizontal into other peripherals like VR/AR/IoT devices (watches) -- but I'm not holding my breath on that until I see a company come out with something amazing. For instance the precursor to the iPhone was the Samsung i300, the leap from the i300 to the iPhone wasn't that big for me, but it changed a lot of things that just made sense.

The leap for peripherals right now would be too great to expect a magical turnaround in adoption -- but I would love to be first in line to be proven wrong.

So where does that leave us? Well we need to rethink things from the ground up again. We've hit local maxima with experience.


> The leap for peripherals right now would be too great to expect a magical turnaround in adoption -- but I would love to be first in line to be proven wrong.

I have a feeling that Apple forcing the move to AirPods is laying the groundwork for that. I would love an iPad that was just a battery and a screen, that connected wirelessly to my phone for processing. Likewise, I'd be interested in a laptop that did the same - but it has to be wireless, and the phone's battery would have to be at least two or three times the capacity of the iPhone X.


I think we need people who have been thinking natively about these devices to think of ways they can actually improve our lives, instead of the people who are still used to thinking of it as a feature sheet and expecting to just strap the newest hardware in. Most of that needs to come at the OS level.


This is why consolidation of power is bad. You can't out run their influence and consideration. Competition is great in both tech and state because you have options (barring collusion).


Spoken like someone who hasn't built an entire company from scratch multiple times. It takes a lot to build and share the vision, get buy-in from believers, build up an audience, distribution, marketing channels, the "right" team, right product, the list goes on -- and all of this is both physically, mentally, and emotionally exhausting.

It's REALLY hard to just reboot into something else you pour yourself into.


How old is the cut off age for enrollment?


Let's hear what everyone has to say here.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: