Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | thatmf's commentslogin

cigarettes don't cause cancer! -cigarette companies

Except this is the company that's been saying "We will cause cancer, please regulate us!"

Please regulate our competition! Challenging our monopoly is a national security risk!

Could you point me to a comment where anyone said regulation should only apply to their competition? Any talk has been for the entire AI industry.

If you claim regulation favors the incumbents, well take it up with parent commenter whose comment seems to imply that regulation is needed!


Incumbents love regulation, because they are much better positioned to comply with it than any upstarts or new challengers. So, when a company like Anthropic gets a decent marketshare, their priority shifts to lobbying for regulation to limit competition.

It is a form of regulatory capture.


That's what I meant, but as the root comment implied, regulation is needed, so the solution is not laissez-faire.

These companies are not going to regulate themselves. Capitalism is going to drive them to relentlessly compete for growth at all costs, a lot of which would be imposed on society. At least they are honest that regulation is needed, unlike Big Tobacco.


TL;DR- consumers pay for tariffs. Duh.

As someone adjacent to the wine biz, few things worth noting:

- Their data source is a major wine importer. The economic realities of the majors versus the smaller, boutique importers, or even the larger independent ones, are very different, because of their market position, reach, their clientele, the type (mass-market) product they carry, etc... in addition to the simple financials of having padding and ability to plan long-term. Anecdotally, most of the smaller-to-mid-size importers I know have actually cut their margins, and are hanging on by a thread. For anyone smaller than the two or three very biggest players, the tariffs have been a drag on business at both ends, and for some have been existential. It's driving consolidation as well, which is never good for consumers. Imagine doing a study on the software industry and only talking to Microsoft.

- In the US we have the three tier system (producer -> importer -> distributor -> retailer) and each of those take a cut, obviously, resulting in higher costs. So those tariffs compound at each layer. There are a few exceptions where you can be a "direct import" retailer (e.g. K&L in CA) but these are a small piece of the pie. Don't even get me started on the costs of shipping, the byzantine legal compliance, etc.

- As for the 14% thing; I'm skeptical of their insinuation of causality. Relevant to this study, 2018, 2019 were exceptionally hot growing seasons in most of europe, a trend which has unfortunately continued, which naturally lead to higher ABV, even as critical trends move in the opposite direction.


whats the carbon pawprint on this lol

...no, actually how many resources were consumed


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: