Maybe. but existance of leaders like Gerhard Schröder displays a different story.
(he is sitting on russian gas companies’ boards, after heavily going against nuclear). No shit the leaders failed the country for their own gains, seems like.
I think you just made a statement that should be repeated often and attributed to you. Barrenko’s corallary or something. Somebody help me with the name. I want see this used and a Wikipedia entry on it
More to the point, Hanlon's Razor is usually an excuse to do nothing, which is a mistake.
It's better to assume that people intend the likely outcome of their actions. If they want to claim stupidity/incompetence as a defene, that's on them.
It's not possible to be Racist towards White people in White majority countries.
"Racism" was invented by Trotsky: a Bolshevik who applied Karl Marx's ideas about class oppression to race. The idea behind Racism is that you have an oppressing race that is Racist towards the oppressed races. The English dictionaries have attempted to change the definition to mean something more like racial bigotry but that's not how people use it. The behavior of the policy makers who argue for this kind of thing still matches Trotsky's ideas.
If you don't like this then stop using their words, what you want to talk about is called "racial bigotry."
You are wrong. Racism is prejudice or discrimination against people (or a person) due to their race or perceived race. White is a race so it is possible to be racist against whites.
Trotsky did not invent racism. People discriminated against others due to their race before Trotsky was even born.
I don't care if you want to call it racism or racial bigotry or whatever. It exists and it can happen against all races, by any race, in every country.
This seems like the exact opposite of what I’ve experienced. For as long as I can remember, the term “racism” was used to describe behavior that was motivated by racial prejudice. You may be correct about the historical origin of the word, but I’ve only experienced this more structural definition within the last few years, and I think it’s safe to say from the anecdotal evidence available online that I’m not alone.
that speech is about 80 years old nowadays. There was plenty of room at that time.
Of course, it also speculated that we would move into quantum computers at some point, what is still a possibility, but now we know that quantum computers won't solve every issue.
This happens in the US too. This kind of thing is why I'm using crypto for as much as I can, I always feel like my bank account might disappear one night and all the money in it will be tied up for a month or so. It's already happened to me once.
I mean, even the IIGS wasn't really an Apple II in a real sense. Classic Apple II programs did use the IIGS' CPU, but were otherwise basically running on the MEGA-II (which I think is also how the Mac LC did Apple compatibility, although I've forgotten). Writing programs for GSOS had more in common with Mac programming than the Apple II, and properly using all of the GS's advanced sound and graphics required entirely different code from an Apple IIe. The 65816 also had a lot of practical issues stemming from the global nature of the 8/16-bit toggle that would've only gotten compounded if you tried to naively extend the architecture to 32-bits.
In the end, yes, I'm very curious what extending the Apple II line would've looked like, in an academic sense. But I suspect that, by the mid-90s, the "Apple II" would've been as technically unrecognizable from the Apple IIe as late 90s PCs were from the original XT: lots of echoes and lots of backwards compatibility, but extremely different when properly and modernly used.
Is it even that? People tolerate a lot more artifacts in 3D than 2D. If you wrote a 2D graphics engine that used triangles as primitives people probably wouldn't like it (and it would probably render text very slowly.)
I would have far preferred being able to pick a default folder or tag to put photos in so they're organized when I take them without the need for any ML. That's what the camera script I wrote for my Pinephone does. Important photos get human readable names when after the first time I use them.
It turns out if you actually use your computer intelligently it's very pleasant to use.
I wouldn't be surprised if this were the case. IME you're better off either going from scratch, using gentoo, or using a different distro rootfs if they have appropriate binaries and just maintaining a custom kernel.
