Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ta9000's commentslogin

Guess that will be a SpaceX problem soon enough. What a mess.

I wonder if the recent announcement spurred them into making a move now rather than later.

CSAM in space! At least he isn’t reinventing the cross town bus.

How was that move legal anyway? Like... a lot of people and governments gave Musk money to develop, build and launch rockets. And now he's using it to bail out his failing social media network and CSAM peddling AI service.

Once he launched the rockets he can do whatever he wants with the profit. And he wants to train Grok.

Yeah and it’s going to bankrupt VW/Stellantis. Surprised Europeans just don’t seem to give a damn about that.

Quite a few do care about the potential for job losses. On the other hand, a lot of people want cheap cars.

This dichotomy has always been in place for a huge range of specifics, both for imports and technology that makes workers less relevant. The "we want cheap stuff" argument is the one that has done best historically, though the track record of handling this badly also led to the invention of actual literal communism.


Doesn’t Tesla have a large and profitable storage business now? Probably could have just built that instead of buying SolarCity.

Tesla customers make great targets to sell Tesla solar. And Solar city customers make great targets of Tesla power banks. Though they should be selling old heavy Tesla batteries for stationary power storage.

Americans are absolutely not a fan of this administration and it will be severely neutered after the midterms. The Supreme Court is already doing some of that.

Americans are not your enemy, Washington (state), California, Illinois, etc (AKA the states with real economic power and all the tech companies) did not vote for this. We still believe in the rule of law and our friendships with our allies.


Why would gold, something that’s had value for thousands of years prior to the Industrial Revolution, have any value?

Wouldn’t that be for the same kinds of reasons things like purple dyes were valuable: rare to find, hard to harvest, hard to transmogrify (insect/sea life guts into clothing dye, gold into chains or other wearables), hard to break, which all culminates into a quick visual indication of wealth.

Now? Gold is a great conductor of electricity (of course silver is better) and some people still like wearing lots of flashy jewelry.

I have no earthly clue why people find it valuable to invest in other than it’s like bitcoin: it’s valuable because everyone else also thinks it’s valuable.

Never once have I read a quarterly progress report from the CEO of the element “gold” outlining profit strategies for the next year.


> I have no earthly clue why people find it valuable to invest in other than it’s like bitcoin: it’s valuable because everyone else also thinks it’s valuable.

Unlike bitcoin there is a price “floor” because of its use in jewelry and industry. Even if no one hoarded it, it would still have some value.


Just because it doesn’t generate a yield doesn’t mean it doesn’t have value. Fresh drinking water is incredibly valuable and will be more so as its supply dwindles.

Gold doesn't corrode away. If gold was cheap, my roof shingles would be made of gold. You'd also have gold wires instead of copper wires.

Even in ancient times it was consumed to make jewelry and decorations. People used to go to the goldsmiths to sell their gold.

Sorry I clearly should have added a /s.

You’re assuming there will ever be enough for these bastards.

blink You OK there bud?

Only 12 year old boys 25 years ago. Use Linux or MacOS, just move on.

I don't think Microslop was a common term 25 years ago.

Okay, Micro$lop.

Nothing new here. LA Times is owned by a right wing billionaire. They post this catastrophizing garbage on the regular now.

This made me smile and sigh at the same time. Hoping prices improve soon.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: