Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sjs7007's commentslogin

Could you share more context on the water bottle thing? That makes no sense to me.


The next morning was really hot, they made us wait in the sun for an hour outside to board the plane, then again for an hour or two in the plane before it departed (even announcing at some point they would land in Manchester instead of London, that got some good reactions out of all of us stranded in Poland). Then in the plane there was no AC and some people were almost fainting, so I stood up and went to get water myself since they were telling people that they couldn't give us water until after we take off. They stopped me and said they would call the cops and they would arrest me wherever we would land if I tried to get water bottles myself. It was ryanair or easyjet, can't remember. can't blame them, they're truly shitty airlines


The "making us wait in the sun for an hour outside to board the plane" is to game the EU limitations on how long the airline can make you wait on the tarmac:

- after 1hr delay, they must provide access to water/A/C/heat/lavatories. Also to medical assistance (if needed). - and after 5hrs on tarmac, passengers must be given the chance to leave the aircraft. - Exceptions: These rules do not apply if the delay is due to safety, security, or ATC reasons.

Making you wait outside on the tarmac before boarding is bad but skirts the regulations. They key clock time to watch is how long were you waiting after boarding the plane?

Probably also useful to reference your specific EU rights if they object.

If after 1+1hrs wait, passengers were going to faint unless they got water, that seems to be pushing "would need medical assistance".


No airline wants passengers up and about while on the tarmac. Once they get clearance to move they need to get going almost immediately and can't move if passengers aren't seated.

That doesn't excuse the flight crew for not handing out water however. That's just a cheap airline being stingier than necessary.


I interpreted it as they were stuck on the tarmac for a long time. People were getting dehydrated and asked for water. The FA’s refused to serve drinks on the tarmac. Passengers said “fuck it this is a health issue I’ll just get it from the galley myself”. The FA’s threatened that anyone who did that would be arrested.

Passengers only options were to either deal with the dehydration or declare an actual emergency and get official medical transport off of the plane to an ER and deal with whatever bills/consequences that might generate.


This but inside the plane waiting for take off, after having waited a long time on the tarmac


I don't have anything useful to add but just want to say, like many others have said, I really appreciate the way you have continued to document your journey from start to today and not shied away from sharing details. Thank you for that!


> compensation is considered regular income for the year it is awarded based on the difference between the strike price and the market price

Isn't that exactly how it works? Your grant price just determines your number of your shares. When your shares vest they get taxed as regular income for the entirety of the vest amount.


> When your shares vest they get taxed as regular income for the entirety of the vest amount.

This describes restricted stock units. Stock options are taxed differently.


That's a neat comic, thanks for the link!


It's being listened to by bots on loop instead of multiple user accounts. So effectively revenue/user is going down with this I'd guess.


The average new grad in a consulting company like TCS/Wipro/Infosys has started at around 3.6-4.8k usd/year for like the past decade. I think Accenture would also be in similar range but not sure.


Well, it's also typically the last place you get the opportunity to make a whole bunch of friendships before heading out into the adult world where it requires much more effort.


In my experience you still have a 3-4 interview loop on too of your take home project.


I guess a better system would be to have different tiered pricing but not strict checks.


Claim two sounded a bit suspicious so I checked the quote:

" He promised, despite unhappy faces from his engineers, that it would take fewer years than he had fingers on his right hand before they were available to everyone – although the price wasn't mentioned."


Indeed. In fact if one were to be pedantic, he said fewer than five, so his prediction was really for 2016, not 2017.


Anyone using the word fewer deserves pedantry (no less)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: