Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sagebird's commentslogin

ok do pornhub next


it's not agi until we have browser browsers automating atm machine machining machines, imo


Wes Anderson is positioning cinematographers on American soil with extremely powerful telephoto lenses, filming actors performing in meticulously designed miniature sets across the Canadian border. The film will be titled "The Asymmetrical Tax Avoidance" and will star Bill Murray as a customs agent with daddy issues.


i wouldn’t be surprised if many insults to human health are not relevant in population that exercises vigorously 5 times a week and have good body composition.

for the average american maybe we are looking for straws that break camels backs that are on the edge of breaking anyways


A more compact and beautiful relation exists between integers and finite rooted trees exist, imo.

David W. Matula found a correspondence between trees and integers using prime factorization, and reported it in 1968 in SIAM: "A Natural Rooted Tree Enumeration by Prime Factorization", SIAM Rev. 10, 1968, p.273 [1]

Others have commented on it before, search the web for Matula Numbers

I independently found this relation when working on a bar code system that was topologically robust to deformation. I wrote a document that explained this relation here[2].

I created an interactive javascript notebook that draws related topological diagrams for numbers. [3]

[1] http://williamsharkey.com/matulaSIAM.png

[2] https://williamsharkey.com/integer-tree-isomorphism.pdf

[3] https://williamsharkey.com/MatulaExplorer/MatulaExplorer.htm...


Sorry - I believe I am off topic as this is not relevant given:

"This indirectly enforces the idea that sets cannot have duplicate elements, as set membership is defined purely by the presence or absence of elements. For example:"

So there is a constraint on what sort of trees are allowed in this -forrest- which would preclude most finite rooted trees.


From [2]:

> EG: 165 = P5 * P3 * P1

Shouldn’t the last component be P2 (= 3)?


You are exactly correct - thank you for reading and letting me know, appreciate your curiosity!


I can intellectualize

But I cannot truly physically believe how much there is here in our universe.

It’s one thing to see zooming out animated diagrams

It’s a whole other thing to see these photos.

Imagine having a mind capable of holding every planet in every galaxy as familiar as we know our own.


The optimus bots seemed laggy. I thought the non verbal communication really suffered compared to a human using fingers and eye contact. The smoothness of the optimus movement was at odds with human movement - delicately but quickly darting around.

When a human makes eye contact with you and signals something with their hands - it is so responsive that you are certain that they are talking to you. With the robots, it was ambiguous.

Did someone put a low pass on the movements on top of a laggy remote control loop?


Is a fine not another way of saying - “no fair!- we want our cut!”


Please don’t do this. Reddit exists, keep HN high quality less jokey. If there is humor it should be hacker culture, not low hanging.


This


It is interesting that operating systems exist for server applications at all.

What is the problem they are solving?

What is the difference between what an operating system contains and can do and what you need it to do?

Why would I want to rent a server to run a program that performs a task, and also have the same system performing extra tasks - like intrusion detection, intrusion detection software updates, etc.

I just don't understand why compiled program that has enough disk and memory would ever be asked to restart for a random fucking reason having nothing to do with the task at hand. It seems like the architecture of server software is not created intelligently.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: