Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | richardbrevig's commentslogin

That's exactly how I've described it to others. No interest in Yellowstone itself, but loved this show and really enjoy 1923 as well.



It seems you have to subscribe to access Hulu.


The marketing terms here are continuous innovation (that doesn't change user behavior) vs discontinuous innovation (that changes user behavior).


Any explanation to why this post is being downvoted?


You may enjoy Plutchik's dyadic wheel of emotions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_connection#/media/File:...

In it, he lists anger as the opposite of fear. And shame is the combination of fear and disgust (the opposite of trust).


> AEDP

Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerated_experiential_dynam...


We should celebrate the move from traditionalism to innovation. Prioritizing tradition over rational thought held our species back for millennia.


Yet innovation also is leading us back to cave times. Can we innovate ourselves out of this hole we innovated..


Do we have a choice at this point? Innovate or perish it seems to me. Luckily there doesn’t appear to be any limits on said innovation.


For the past month, I've written my thoughts into a daily journal. I then send that to a group that read it every day and respond. Had 15 a month ago but some were toxic. I'm now down to 5 people. I understand they don't understand possibly even most of what I write, but knowing they'll read it motivates me to express my thoughts--whatever they are at the time.

But yes to your point about the co-founder, they'll understand everything you're talking about.


Not entirely off topic, but I recently attempted sharing my life story with people via daily written installments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUC2aFkBHiw&8d3=7f5h

The video basically introduces me and what I'm doing.


Why is very popular in the design community, like the five whys [0]. But now I'm always at odds when I speak about it after listening to Richard Dawkins and other scientists say "why is a stupid question." They advise to ask, "what led to this?" And doing that has helped me reframe situations and make discoveries.

Even still, why is a great shorthand in many contexts. :)

0 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_whys


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: