So like sudo

I think they mean both "know about a lot of different fields" and also "be able to connect them together to draw inferences", the latter perhaps being tricky?

Maybe? They should speak more clearly regardless, so we don't have to speculate over it. The way you worded it is much more understandable.

There wasn't much room to speculate really, but requires some knowledge of understanding problem spaces, topology, and things like minima and maxima.

There are such implementations for React Native: https://reactnative.dev/docs/out-of-tree-platforms

Potheads have always said stuff like that. You might have been talking to a pothead.

I grew up around hippies and potheads but this new legal-weed brand of normie pothead is different. It’s depressing.

Does the moon offer much heat dissipation potential vs. orbit? The lunar surface seems like an almost-as-harsh environment.

There is a whole fucking moon you can embed heatsinks into.

Also 1.2 seconds is like ridiculously long, unacceptable latency.

My contention is that for large ai query, it's not that unacceptable.

* no electric bill: if you use solar panels to provide your own power, you also have no electric bill on Earth.

* no cost for land: land in sunny places where crops don't grow (for instance) is good for solar power and very cheap compared to building out a datacenter

* no charge for maintenance: sorry, I really don't get this one. Why don't the computers in space need any maintenance?

A lot of people who are a little bit ignorant think it's really easy to cool things in space because space is notoriously very cold.

Physics, it turns out, is slightly more complicated than this and it turns out vacuum is an incredibly good insulator and more (much more) than offsets the temperature differential in terms of how easy it is to cool something.

So reveal the unbiased truth to us please -- what's the real motivation for consolidating these companies?

It's uhhh... clearly explained in the linked announcement.

I think the two can be called "rule of law" or "rule of men". I would have thought more people would support "rule of law".

It was always people who ruled, it's just more apparent when the people who rule are bullies itching for a fight, who care even less about the appearance of consistency.

For moral accountability, it should always in the end be "I say", not "the law says". No one should "just be obeying orders", they should make choices they can stand behind on their own judgment, regardless of whether some group of possibly long dead legislators stood behind it or not.

Most Americans get plenty of protein without trying. It's hard to see how eating more meat should help unless you think the amount of protein actually needed is much more than what the May Clinic thinks: https://www.mayoclinichealthsystem.org/hometown-health/speak...

The "without trying" people probably aren't going to make much use of a food pyramid anyway. The guidelines are more aimed at people who will try.