Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rcruzeiro's commentslogin

Back when I saw doing freelance work, the worst type of client was the one who was semi-technical, meaning they were technical enough to write code that they wanted to contribute to the project or to have strong architectural opinions, but not technical enough to understand the nuances and the implications of their suggestions.

I guess that, with vibe coding, it is very easy for every client to become like this.


> [...] they wanted to contribute to the project or to have strong architectural opinions

Also the worst kind of tech line-manager - typically promoted from individual contributors , but still want to argue about architecture, having arrived at their strong opinion within the 7 minutes they perused the design document between meetings.

If you're such a manager, you need to stop, if you're working with one, change teams or change jobs - you cannot win.


What are your thoughts on the idea from the book High Output Management where everyone's outputs under the manager is considered the managers output. Aka if they're choosing incorrectly it's trivial to explain the facts for them to choose right. If they don't you get them to agree to the wrong choice in writing and move on

> if they're choosing incorrectly it's trivial to explain the facts for them to choose right

It's far from trivial when there are multiple, clearly-communicated trade-offs (documented in the design doc!) that, but you happen to land on opposite ends of value-judgements (e.g. pattern A is easier to maintain based on my experience with the codebase & bugs that have popped up, but manager thinks pattern B is simpler to implement, but brittle). The debate wastes time, and signals mistrust when you're the staff engineer, or the design was OK'd by staff/rest of team


> but not technical enough to understand the nuances and the implications of their suggestions.

That isn't unique to "clients." It's human nature. Human's don't know what they don't know.

See: various exploits since computers were a thing.


Try photocopying some US dollar bills.


While I think the link between birth rates declining and automation does make sense, it will take quite sometime for this to verifiable as this is a somewhat recent anxiety. The reason for the trend that we have seem over the last decades seem to mostly stem from lower childhood mortality rates, women having access to the job market, and perhaps to a lesser extent climate anxiety.


Out of curiosity, I live in Europe where it is quite common to work remotely across countries within the EU or the UK. I have always wondered why so many US companies limit remote roles to people based in the US, and then mention a shortage of qualified talent. It feels like there is a large pool of people being overlooked.


In our position we're only hiring for in person roles, so location/authorization is a must have.

But in regards to US/EU remote, I imagine the EU candidates come with slightly higher overhead (different payroll processing, employment regulations, time zones, etc). Which makes it easier to adopt a US only approach.


In Europe, what we do is usually: if the person lives in the same country as one of our business entities, they get hired directly as an employee. If they live in a country where the company does not have a business presence, they get hired through an EOR or as a contractor.


Do you have any data to back up the claim that it's "quite common" to work remotely across countries within the EU/UK. Almost nothing in the "common/single market" works uniformly across the "common/single market". For instance this guy (OP) doesn't have a hope in hell of landing a job anywhere in the EU even though he's in the UK.


I know it’s anecdotal data, but every company that I’ve work for in the past 11 years? I’ve worked for companies in the UK, France, Portugal. If you check the job listings for remote jobs in Europe, you will find that there is rarely a constraint to where in Europe the candidate is located in.


Labor laws. They think it's less profitable to employ people that are protected by regulations that grant them time off etc.


Maybe MechaHitler wouldn't have happened.


Have you bothered reading the post where the author stated why they cannot simply ditch GCP?


yes.

If you had actually read the post you would have understood there are ways to ditch GCP, but they are perceived as cumbersome.

The exaple is OpenID Connect. It works well with Azure (according to the post).

I'm sorry to say this, but the author is choosing something easy but unrealiable over something a bit more complicated but reliable.

It's really the author's fault. They are choosing their comfort over the service reliability (and keeping promises made to customers).

Heck they might even go with api keys. They could give explicit direction on the minimal amount of permissions the api key would need and they could ping the users each 3-4 months to rotate them.

But no, I guess we'll have another post at some point about the fourth (definitive?) account suspension.


> The exaple is OpenID Connect. It works well with Azure

That's nonsense. It requires a 7 step setup process that customers will mess up.


> I think the OO hatred comes from how academia and certain enterprise organisations for our industry picked it up and taught it like a religion.

This, this, this. So much this.

Back when I was in uni, Sun had donated basically an entire lab of those computers terminals that you used to sign in to with a smart card (I forgot the name). In exchange, the uni agreed to teach all classes related to programming in Java, and to have the professors certify in Java (never mind the fact that nobody ever used that laboratory because the lab techs had no idea how to work with those terminals).

As a result of this, every class from algorithms, to software architecture felt like like a Java cult indoctrination. One of the professors actually said C was dead because Java was clearly superior.


> One of the professors actually said C was dead because Java was clearly superior.

In our uni (around 1998/99) all professors said that except the Haskell teacher who indeed called Java a mistake (but c also).


Turns out everyone was completely wrong except for that one guy working in Haskell.

Tale as old as time.


Java was probably close to 50% of the job market at some point in the 2000s and C significantly dried up with C++ taking its place. So I'm afraid everyone was right actually.

To be honest, I'm convinced the reason so many people dislike Java is because they have had to use it in a professional context only. It's not really a hobbyist language.


Just for the record, I don't think C ever dried up in the embedded space. And the embedded space is waaaay bigger than most people realise, because almost all of it is proprietary, so very little "leaks" onto the public interwebs.


Believe it or not but there is plenty of Java and C++ in the embedded space. It’s far from being a C fortress.


Java in the embedded space? I believe you, but I know nothing about this area. Can you share some examples?


Probably the Sun Ray computer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Ray


This was it!


And now you know how Nvidia CUDA got so popular.


Nuclear plants follow a strict “as low as reasonably achievable” (ALARA) principle. Any intake of reactor water or radiation exposure must be reported and evaluated no matter how small.


The water is borated and heavily purified. You don’t want stuff growing inside, but at the same time you don’t want to have chlorinated water slowly corroding the metal components.


Check out this study. Pretty wild! [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7760952/]


I also read in the XKCD thing that it might be up to about 50° so it's probably a bit uncomfortable for most algae type things.

I bet there's some good chance of getting wacky extremophiles though!


50C is terribly hot for a swim.

Hot spring baths usually top out around 42-43C


Would you mind sharing a link to "the xkcd thing" if you have it?

edit: sorry for being lazy, I scrolled a bit more and found it.



Relevant: "For the kinds of radiation coming off spent nuclear fuel, every 7 centimeters of water cuts the amount of radiation in half."


On the picture, the fuel rods are indeed protected by a huge quantity of water above them. But what happens below them ? They seem to be in direct contact with the ground...


People tend to avoid casually tunneling under nuclear pools.


I would guess that in reality they are either suspended and/or there is enough concrete at the bottom


Oh the Internet Explorer 6 + ActiveX days…


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: