Sounds interesting. How do candidates update their profiles? It can be annoying to have to replicate information that's already on both a CV and LinkedIn into yet another recruitment system's custom format. I can understand the limitations of parsing a CV, but how do you make it easy for candidates to describe themselves?
Great question—this is exactly the pain we wanted to eliminate.
Candidates get their own dedicated workspace where they set up their profile just once—it’s a modern, intuitive flow where they can upload their resume, profile picture, set preferences, and fill in any info recruiters actually need.
Once set up, they can apply to any job shared with them by a recruiter in one click—no need to re-enter the same details again. And if they update their profile (say, new experience or skills), those changes instantly reflect across the candidate pool of every recruiter they’re connected with.
No redundant form-filling, no duplicating what’s already in a CV or LinkedIn—just one clean profile that stays up to date and works across roles.
I hope I answered your question. I am happy to answer any other question you might have. Thank you.
This is one area where richer countries can learn a lot from poorer countries, should they choose to listen.
When I lived in Liberia, there were about 10-15 different newspapers in the capital, from websites to print to one guy with a massive chalk board on the main road. This diversity of sources served quite a small population, but there was a massive appetite for news.
In such a situation, you don't expect impartiality, but each news organisation's perspective sites is more obvious, and reading about events from multiple perspectives gives, in my view, a broader and clearer window into what happened.
I think it could make sense to value in news, not impartiality, but diversity of viewpoints.
Conveniently, the internet does make this much easier.
Alomg those same lines, even if something is considered impartial, we would need to gather multiple viewpoints to fact check that it actually is impartial.
I would add that the terrible politics doesn't need to be local. There are a large number of international norms that benefit the already-wealthy, at the expense of the poor, for example, by supporting authoritarians in other countries.
You may or may not be correct, but I'd say, citation needed.
It's not self-evident that life is such a zero-sum game that more people necessarily means fewer resources to go around; I'd even venture that the last hundred years of development suggests the opposite.
It's quite possible that more people enables a slew of network effects (such as technology improvements due to more minds attacking a problem, say) that improves everyone's living standards.
You might want to look into EcoFlow. I use their River system to provide backup power for my home equipment (I have frequent power outages, usually about 2 hours in length). I can't tell you whether it'll work for medical equipment, though.
I checked out EcoFlow a few weeks ago along with the Anker Solix range. Anker's switching times are around 20ms and I wasn't able to find EcoFlow's switching times. The switching times indicate the UPS performance. It needs to be quite low for sensitive equipments like a dialysis machines. The APC SMX range provides switching times of 4ms.
If we're doing dad jokes now, it's unfortunate that King Solomon didn't know about the Banach-Tarski paradox. Otherwise, instead of cutting the baby into two pieces, he could have suggested five pieces and made both mothers happy.
Ubuntu is an isiXhosa/isiZulu word, and the concept (and similar words) exist in other Bantu languages... But, although Swahili is a Bantu language, I don't think it's a word in Swahili. (To be fair, I can't claim fluency in Swahili, but it's not in any of my dictionaries.)
