Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | petenick's commentslogin

Curious - what is your use case?


Folks tend not to answer this question because they know it's not a good one.

Let's take bitpay, probably the largest and oldest merchant processing system for crypto transactions. They publish stats. [1]

- 40% of all of their transactions globally are for prepaid gift cards.

- 20% of all of their transactions globally are for "internet."

- 14% of all of their transactions globally are for "vpn."

So 75% of all of their transactions globally are for merchant categories closely associated with fraud. And the reason is obvious: it's slower, more expensive and less convenient than using a credit or debit card. So it self-selects.

Folks who "find a way to make it work" are usually ideological, in crypto (i.e. found other people who don't care that it's impractical or criminal) or have otherwise found ways of "processing crypto transactions" (i.e. using bitpay where the merchants do not receive crypto because of course they don't why would they).

[1] https://bitpay.com/stats/


As a Com Truise fan myself, I enjoyed learning that Brian commissioned him for the ad. Com’s slow motion funk fit in perfectly with the minimalist DVD screensaver motif.


Ahh! That's why it sounded so familiar! Thank you pointing that out or I might've missed it.


“The best way to fix the system is to prioritize websites that are there to share knowledge, not websites with their primary priority to make ad revenue.”

The best way to fix the system is to prioritize the best content irrespective of monetization strategy.

Search engines should not penalize websites trying to make money.

They should penalize spammy websites that add little value but know how to game the system.

The degree to which the creator monetizes their content should bear little weight with a search engine that is trying to serve the best content.


I haven't seen much discussions about solving the entire "search sucks" mess by simply introducing rich filtering for the results.

The way I see it is that Google is still some weird magic box that throws a bunch of random results out based on some black magic logic.

It's beyond my comprehension that there are no filters on any on the search engines (at least I don't remember seeing any).

By having some filtering options, such as "No JavaScript", "No ads", "SSGs only", "Page size < 1MB" and so on, search would be much better.


YC funds software companies disrupting large markets. Software has high margins. Large markets are easy to intuit. Therefore business plans aren’t as necessary as opposed to other types of investors eg private equity.


I have been looking for an objective, skeptical evaluation of web3 and this delivers. Despite all of the discussion around decentralization, market forces like network effects, switching costs, and winner-take-all will likely occur and with it some degree of centralization.


Don’t assume malevolence when working with someone else but rather that they’re acting in their own self interest


I found it easy to use and it left no ambiguity around what Tiny is and how it works


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: