Today, I encountered an issue where the modal's close button appeared to be unresponsive. Upon reviewing the modal and the button, everything seemed to be set up correctly, yet clicking the button didn’t close the modal. I later realized that multiple instances of the same modal had been opened. When I clicked the close button, only the topmost modal closed, leaving the others still visible underneath.

It is not gossip tense. There is no such name in Turkish grammar.

And similar things are still going on today

Not purely. It includes a software development about Chemistry.

every science includes software development for a few decades now

It doesn't deserve a Chemistry Nobel prize. It deserves a prize about computers.

So the Nobel commite was wrong to decide this because you think otherwise?

Interesting. Any more indepth analys about this?

Btw. you don't just build AlphaFold by doing only 'computers'. Take a look at any good docmentary about it and you will see that they do discuss chemistry on a deep level

Deepmind isn't a chemistry company. Demiss Hassabis isn't a chemist. A tool they developed in their area may turn out to be useful in Chemistry. They may spend some relatively short time and effort to apply their tool to Chemistry. They can do the same thing in many areas in every few years and collect all the Nobel's in many areas. That effort is worth for a prize but the context is different.

It is possible that some committee members might have raised this same concern in their discussions.

relatively short : in comparison to real chemists, whose work is the basis for this development.

This is my first interaction in Hackernews, and I was expecting a more polite discussion. I just expressed my idea. You could ask for my explanations.

You didn't start a discussion with a good argument from begin with though.

And i personally really think if people from a different field, jump into a new field and revolutionize it, a nobel price is not a bad thing to appreciate this effort.

physiology&medicine more likely

He writes software in different areas, so he has the potential to get a Nobel prize in any area soon.

These people aren't in the "These authors contributed equally" list.

He is a chemist now.

Combine this with the Physics prize, I now have hope to receive a Nobel prize in any area. Seriously, from now on, I won't mention Nobel prizes anywhere anymore.

The paper represents the work which lead to the prize.

if A=B and A=C, then A=C

> if A=B and A=C, then A=C

Technically true, but you might still want to double check your logic.

Not all of the work. For example, it doesn't account for the fact that Demis Hassabis, as head of DeepMind, undoubtedly recruited many of the co-authors to participate in this effort, which is worth something when it comes to the final output.

To recruit isn't scientific work.

I didn't realize the Nobel specified that the only work which mattered was that of the "scientific" variety.

What will the paper do with the prize money?