Your reasoning is speculation and your sources only really show evidence for your claim that religiosity is declining.
Another correlation with birthrate is wealth. Wealthy countries have more expensive costs associated with raising children, such as housing and childcare. Given that children can't effectively work for 15-20 years, they are a financial burden. In poor countries, children become another set of hands that can be put to use from only a few years old.
It’s no different here where I live in Australia, for small property crimes anyway. They’ll file a report at least, but nothing will happen even if you know exactly who did it and have video proof.
I doubt in office staff are more valued by companies than remote staff. If the company is moderately large then you will not be any more visible than a remote worker.
I'd be surprised if we're not just figures on a spreadsheet to those high enough up.
>At work, there's a box on an HR form where employees can choose between: disabled, not disabled, or prefer not to say
I've always assumed these things were just for statistics. I doubt much will change just from changing your answer.
That said, in the places I've worked (disclaimer: not US) it seems the vast majority of people are not just accepting of autism but are actively aware of how it affects people and are prepared to make adjustments to accommodate.
It wouldn't even be brought up in an interview in my current team, unless you wanted to discuss it. It wouldn't be held against you at all.
I think it might surprise you if you communicate the problems you're having. If someone in my team felt like their work environment was causing them to need to pull all nighters then we'd try to address it.
I'm not going to defend the other commenters point but I find your position strange.
Imagine a person covered in poo, ripped clothes leaving visible track marks from using intraveinous drugs.
I'm sure if you were forced to interact with that person, you'd not be happy, right? Does that make you shallow?
I'm not sure someone wearing pyjamas is the slippery slope the previous commenter thinks it is, but their point about preferring people who make themselves more presentable is valid.
I’m rather confused. The topic was how one looked. Where did poo and drugs come from? And where did happiness come from? Do you consider happiness a judgement?
Put aside the sample size of one for a moment. The fact you've only dealt with the police when genuinely committing crimes, and their response was proportional to the crime, is most likely down to your skin colour.
> and their response was proportional to the crime, is most likely down to your skin colour.
And also due to the fact I was calm, reasonable, cooperative, and didn't point a gun at them. If you are trying to argue that a person's behavior has no effect on how likely they are to be killed by a cop then you are just completely wrong.
Those are 4 people out of many thousands that have been killed by police in the US, they are hardly representative. A persons actions have hundreds of times more impact on how likely they are to be killed by a cop than his race.
Another correlation with birthrate is wealth. Wealthy countries have more expensive costs associated with raising children, such as housing and childcare. Given that children can't effectively work for 15-20 years, they are a financial burden. In poor countries, children become another set of hands that can be put to use from only a few years old.