Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mparramon's commentslogin

They call it the programmer's dozen, 9 bits for a byte


That's how Steve Irwin died.


I've yet to have one single problem after running Firefox as my main driver for ~3 months. Only 2 webpages have made me quickly open Chrome instead to check them out, and the content wasn't worth engaging for long.

It puzzles me how more programmers don't switch to a real open source browser not controlled by an advertising giant which will use their overwhelming monopolistic force to steer the way browsers work so that it benefits its bottom line.

Vote with your feet, use Firefox.


> It puzzles me how more programmers don't switch to a real open source browser not controlled by an advertising giant

Let us know when you find one.


I used it for many years but ultimately abandoned it because its memory use was just unacceptably high. A couple of windows with 30-40 tabs in each would eat all my laptop's memory - Chromium in a similar setup will sit around 40% used. I don't know what Firefox is doing but it's crazy far off the pace there.

Mozilla should be focusing on fixing things like that and making the browser be good before the barely related campaigning, let alone the whole "we're going to be an advertising business as well" thing.


Sounds like an extension issue. Firefox by itself uses way way less memory than Chromium-base browsers.


I had a few extensions, I don't think anything especially unusual. Regardless, Chromium with a few similar extensions (ublock is the most notable) performs far better.


Running latest Firefox on latest MacOS on Intel.

Hundreds of tabs open, memory usage is ~3GB for main process, 2-3GB for isolated content (ie the tabs).

Really not sure what the problem is.


Are you on Linux, Windows or macOS ?


Linux


They taught me in school to think about preconditions, invariant and postconditions for loops. Then I switched to only using functional affordances like .map() and .each(). I am much happier now.



It’s the principle. When they’ve shown they’ll jank one extension because it doesn’t align with their business model, they’ve shown they’ll jank any extension in the future as they see fit.

I’m voting with my feet.


They didn't yank an extension.


They yanked many, technically


I did, a few months ago when they disabled uBlock on my Chrome.

The experience has been a delight. It runs smoothly, I can customize it more than Chrome (compact mode being one example [1]), and with the official iCloud Passwords extension I get to use the same password manager I use on my iPhone.

I don’t think I’ll ever go back. Best part being, if I need something that Chrome provides and Firefox doesn’t, I can potentially implement it myself, and contribute to a proper open source project while I’m at it.

1: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/compact-mode-workaround...


This would mean that short term tasks, the bulk of what knowledge workers do nowadays, forgo learning on the job.


Remove the </satire> and you have a viral X post in your hands. People will believe and act on this analysis. Future think thanks will be based on it. The revolution of the machines is nigh.


Previous discussion (flagged): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31051354


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: