I have the exact opposite experience and find Fastnail's spam detection quite superior.
There is the occasional spam.email getting through - maybe 1 per day - despite the fact that I have quite a number of custom domains with catch-all email addresses.
At the same time I really never have to check my spam folder for false positive, everything in there is literal spam so I forget checking it for weeks on end.
Whereas on n Gmail I always need to check the spam folder, Google completely overdoes the filtering it and a lot of wanted emails end up in spam.
Works for me on a 2018 Moto w stock Android 10.
My color options are (translated) natural, boosted and saturated, w saturated active. Seems to be the factory default.
> Works for me on a 2018 Moto w stock Android 10. My color options are (translated) natural, boosted and saturated, w saturated active. Seems to be the factory default.
Since there's no mainstream browser for Android that supports Display P3, it's unlikely that you're seeing the correct image.
There's a test image as part of this excellent article on color; you'll know right away if your hardware and browser supports Display P3 or not [1].
I'm using Safari on a 2017 iMac, so I can see the Display P3 images.
CyberChef - The "Cyber Swiss Army Knife" - single file web app for all kinds of conversions, encryption, encoding, compression and data analysis
https://gchq.github.io/CyberChef/
This is a good point, but it doesn't invalidate the premise. The first sites to use bootstrap and this particular brochure template truly stood out. And today, with everyone using it, it still works okay, well enough to be a bona fide standard, but it of course doesn't work nearly as well as it did for those early adopters.
What I'm saying is, the next big thing, for marketing in particular, may very well be derided in this same "Hey look..." manner after it takes off in popularity, but the pioneers of that next big thing are going to reap serious profits.
this is a good analogy, in that some supermarkets feel soulless, whereas others feel really cozy, even though ultimately they both have aisles with stuff on shelves. it's like the difference between someone using a template versus making something by hand. there's a human feel to the latter.
I think you both have a good point. I guess it depends on what your relationship you have with food. Do you prefer your shopping experience to be predictable and efficient or do you like to discover something new and exciting.
Realistically, most people who browse the web don't care too much about website design and just want something reasonably functional that's not too ugly.
Pretty neat. You can encode 100 megabytes of data in a 4x4x4x4 cm tesseract, just need to apply an appropriate rotation around two of its axes and then you can extract the information as it intersects with 3d space.
I mean you joke, but a local sports good store has switched to using RFID tags for all their products. First time I went shopping after the change was rather startling. I dumped my purchases at the cash register and almost immediately the cashier read me the total.
I see no reason supermarkets couldn't do similar once this sort of tech gets prolific enough.
They are literally designed to make you buy products. The milk in the back corner is the most famous example so that you have to pass by as much product as possible to get it and have less chance of not impulse buying. End caps…all the candy right next to the checkout lane, etc.
I guess I worded it incorrectly. My point was that it's two completely different ways of selling you things. Supermarkets use all these techniques to subconsciously make you buy more things, but they rarely try to sell you a singular product.
Product websites actively try to distinguish themselves, to make you feel that the product is unique and convince you it'll make your life better. Having the same style of website for every product ever feels like something that'd actively go against the goal of the website. After all, if two things look the same, why would I pick one over the other?
As a previous bagger boy gone stocker gone high-as-a-kite meat dept clerk, the milk is in the back because it is stocked from a walk-in fridge. People don't even buy much milk.
I mean, there are certainly bonehead comments. Any time Jan 6 comes up, conspiracy theorists will come out of the woodwork and say it was a false flag operation done by Antifa or the Deep State. Nearly anything supporting NFTs is bone-headed.
But this one was just baffling on another level. Like...what do you think supermarkets exist for? Just for people to look around and go "Neat! They put a whole chicken in a can!"?[0]
[0] There actually IS a supermarket like that though. It's called Omega Mart, and it's a tourist attraction in Las Vegas. They sell weird shit like a household cleaning spray called "Who Told You This Was Butter? Seriously, Don't Eat This", "Emergency Clams", and a laundry detergent called "Plausible Deniability". But even in the case of Omega Mart, you can still buy all the products.
Supermarkets are literally designed to sell you on products. Every single product placement is from a planogram meant to juice the sales per sqft of space, from which aisle the item appears to which row and where within the row it’s positioned.
Same. I almost exclusively use Dropbox, despite having an Office365 subscription with 1TB OneDrive. I tried moving to OneDrive when Dropbox raised their prices, but gave up after a couple days when OneDrive still couldn’t sync my files. Dropbox just works, no matter the number or size of files I throw at them.
I can literally already hear the desperate cries for help from people who have lost access to their Dropbox accounts because they are accused of selling things that violate vaguely worded terms of service.
