The Uros people moved from land to fabricated islands on Lake Titicaca to escape Incan conquest. The Aztecs created islands to have more productive farmland. Likewise the Incas when creating Cusco in a marshy valley.
As others have commented, it's hard to draw conclusions from such a biased sample set. To truly determine causation we would need to run a double blind experiment.
Not all, but enough to make this a viable product. There are a lot of high volume, low-sku warehouses where each product is light enough for Stretch's arm.
As with any robotics project, there are a lot of ways that this might fail, but my money is not on boxes being too heavy or flimsy.
In my (coworker's) experience with this sensor, they don't send a datasheet or give any specs on power, but they will replace your demo unit when you ruin your first one by trying to power it with PoE.
Not OP, but where I work (Fox Robotics) we leave RL to demos and researchers. It is very promising, but less understood and less proven, so we aren't in a hurry to design any products around it.
If you google 'when to refactor rule', the first hit is "rule of three" followed by a bunch of other articles also calling it by this name. It's a fairly popular term/idea.
Trump recently announced we are doubling the size of southern command and dramatically increasing our activity off the coast of Venezuela, where this occurred. Could the cruise ship have been doing something sneaky?
Highly unlikely. It looks way better for Trump to have a big grey US Navy ship with large guns off the coast of Venezuela. Why hide on an old cruise ship?
The first definition I see for attraction is "pleasing to the senses" and the second is "sexually alluring." If OP meant something more than physical, then "attraction" was a misleading word choice.
Even with your definition of attraction, attraction-based love is fundamentally self-serving, and those who practice it rob themselves of the beauty of blind commitment in loving relationships.
If the definition of attraction is to be read to encompass everything that makes you like a person, doesn't it make the original statement vacuous? "Liking each other is what helps couples stay together?" I suppose it's true that few couples ever got divorced who wanted to be together. But it doesn't tell us anything.
