Let’s say you’re right. Do we still want to, though? I mean. At some point we will no longer have the skill to babysit the AI agent.

When the LLM code bases are too complex for the humans on deck to understand and debug… that sounds like the turning point when companies go back to real developers IMO. Any serious mission critical code needs knowledgeable humans on deck who can leap into again when s** hits the fan, put out fires and patch critical bugs.

Not if you can have the AI rewrite your entire stack in 5 minutes and you just deploy that. CR/CD ftw! (continuous rewrite/continuous deployment)

How much math skills do you need to appreciate this book?

the Postscript at the end says:

While not every student is expected to read the book sequen- tially cover to cover, it is important to have the details in one place. Calculus is not a subject that can be learned in one pass. Indeed, this book nearly assumes readers have already had a year of calculus, as had the students of MAT 157Y. I hope this book will grow with its readers, remaining both readable and informative over multiple traversals, and that it provides a useful bridge between current calculus texts and more advanced real analysis texts.

My first impression, paging through it, is that it's at a somewhat higher level than the typical college calculus course.

Good. Maybe then my company is happy to adopt Linux or Mac.

People here too return them. It is a social class question.

The difference between the ratio of people returning their carts at Wal-mart vs at the Natural Foods store where I live is substantial.

Here, US?

Wrong conclusion. Not «people», but customers at that particular store.

This helped me so much during my phd

They both use heat. But stirling converts mechanically, whereas STEM converts energy to electricity «directly».