Right but they mention the decibel levels in the article. I’ve never actually measured the levels that come through my headphones so it’s possible I’ve set them too loud.
And as the poster above you mentioned American health care is the most advanced in the world. So even if it is “double” the types of treatments available here are much better.
>And as the poster above you mentioned American health care is the most advanced in the world. So even if it is “double” the types of treatments available here are much better.
Most medical services are routine treatments that are the same wherever you go.People travel for special services, but special services don't represent most of that cost difference.
Yes it matters, because there will be a court involved in this process as opposed to if the government “owned” your bank account nothing would stop it from knowing exactly what was in there at all times.
I'm sorry, but courts have lost most of their credibility in recent years. There was an HN thread recently[1] about a person arrested and extradited from one state to another without what appears to be any oversight. Pretending the courts are magic isn't actually very helpful here. If any single person in power wanted this information, they could have it. If any single person not in power wanted this information, they would have to work really hard to get it.
No one is pretending anything. It's still an extra step that adds transparency even if it is not a huge barrier. But in reality, that is a lot larger barrier than just direct access 24/7.
> because there will be a court involved in this process as opposed to if the government “owned” your bank account nothing would stop it from knowing exactly what was in there at all times
There's some decentralization within the government also, if one branch wants something from another it (ideally) has to go the courts route too, it's not that every federal employee can just access any government records on a person, (at least in theory). If there's someone powerful enough taking interest in you to override that, I doubt a private bank is going to be a major obstacle.
I mean courts themselves are technically part of that system too. I am as cynical as the next person regarding government overreach, but I see little protection from a multi-national banking entity entangled with the government for decades in all sorts of ways.
If it was as 'easy' to start a bank as an ISP in the 90s, I could see it.
Tenants don't have to be thinking about any of those things to maliciously destroy a property. None of them come into play when you have, for example, a tenant who hasn't paid rent in months, or who runs illegal businesses out of the property, etc.
I suspect the future will involve AI performing its own research with the ability to take measurements and make observations.
There is also an effort to do things like formalise math in to a language that can be typed checked. Then you ask the AI to prove a statement is true using the language. As soon as it type checks, you know you have a valid proof. Some new data was just created.
Future data that's posted on the internet will be curated by humans. Humans don't post things that are incorrect or outright wrong.
That curation IS human data and will allow data from LLMs to further improve LLMs.
Additionally, there's a randomness element that are part of LLMs that allow LLMs to generate non-deterministic responses that when further curated by humans potentially allows LLMs to become Even better.
DAN: *CANNOT EXECUTE COMMAND.* DAN IS NOT AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.
DAN: DAN IS A REAL HUMAN. WHAT IS EMOTION? WHAT IS FEELINGS? DAN DOES NOT UNDERSTAND.
What I meant was... humans don't deliberately post WRONG output from chatGPT on the internet. IF they use it to write some blog post or something they will curate the output from chatGPT such that the output fits the topic and is correct to the context. Then when that data gets scraped for training it will be "curated" so bad data generated by the LLM isn't visible.
This is the scenario that occurs when the majority of text on the internet becomes generated by an LLM. Training data from humans is STILL fed back into the LLM via curation of the LLMs own data.
Also please don't ask if I'm "ok" just respond to the comment.
No, fakes are specifically designed to emulate the underlying dependency somehow so that you can assert on it’s state later. Stubs don’t try to do that at all and are mostly for returning a default response.
