Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more k1t's commentslogin

Occasionally you need to try restoring from your backups.

Obviously a full restore gives you full confidence, and it goes down from there.

Ideally try to restore about 10% of your content every month,but really it depends on how high stakes your backups are.


Where do you restore to? Do you restore to a spare computer or do you restore into some isolated part (folder) of the production system from which the backup was originally taken?

And to which extent can this be automated, so that the backup gets automatic health checks?


Just use restic. It handles these things.


I think that's the classic US/UK culture split though.

US is strict on language and nudity, but comparatively lax on violence (except blood).

UK is lax on nudity and language (comparatively), but very strict on violence.

UK being the country that considered the word "ninja" too violent for children, for example.


I’m pretty sure GTA has never been rated below M which, as I recall, is 17+. Not a massive difference between that and BBFC’s 18 rating…


Violence is pretty okay in the middle east, which makes it socially acceptable by inheritance in the uk.


2.3 vs 3.2?


Smells like AI and completely fails to answer the question.

How is the IP address of the DoH server obtained?


Firefox accepts a bootstrap IP, or uses the system resolver:

> network.trr.bootstrapAddress

> (default: none) by setting this field to the IP address of the host name used in "network.trr.uri", you can bypass using the system native resolver for it. Use this to get the IPs of the cloudflare server: https://dns.google/query?name=mozilla.cloudflare-dns.com

> Starting with Firefox 74 setting the bootstrap address is no longer required in mode 3. Firefox will attempt to use regular DNS in order to get the IP address of the trusted resolver. However, if DNS resolution of the resolver domain fails, setting the bootstrap address is again necessary.

Source: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Trusted_Recursive_Resolver


What I'd really appreciate is a demo/sandbox version where I can try out the functionality without having to enter anything personal.

I appreciate that you have a (generous looking) free tier and various screenshots - but it just seems like something I'd want to play around with before taking the time to create an account and start entering personal data into.


We do offer a sandbox with preset examples that lets you explore the app. No need to enter any personal data, but you will need to sign up.


Thanks - I'll check it out then!


Unfortunately, while you're right, it has plenty of annoyances, there's no real alternative.


Matrix doesn't have that problem and it's even federated, without a single point of failure.


Matrix does have that problem. I’ve lost so much message history to key management bugs.


This was pretty common until (I think) late last year, but GP was writing in present tense. The Matrix team have been fixing the various bugs responsible. I haven't seen an "unable to decrypt" error recently.

https://matrix.org/blog/2024/10/29/matrix-2.0-is-here/#4-inv...


Fwiw I still can read more than 5 years old messages in the new Element X app, which I recently installed.


I really want Matrix to succeed but it's not there yet, and not really making progress either.

It's vastly more complicated than Signal.


I don't really use Whatsapp, or any IM client on my phone, but do have a few friends use Telegram so I'm using it on my computer. We're looking at alternatives. We tried out Signal, and that feels extremely basic and spartan, like old ICQ or AIM. We tried Matrix (with the Element client) and it feels much more featureful and modern. And the federated aspect feels much better than the centralized nature of Signal.

Can you explain a bit more about where you feel the complication comes from?

This group of friends are mostly not very technical. They were able to create an account on matrix.org perfectly fine. They felt a bit strange that they had to pick a username "like in the past" and not use their phone number. But at the same time they felt pretty nice not giving away their phone number to a foreign company/organization.


Matrix makes progress, see https://matrix.org/blog/2023/09/matrix-2-0/ and the UX has improved a lot since Element X (compared to previous Element), especially encryption settings have been simplified (a pain point I myself discovered when onboarding less experienced people)


> I really want Matrix to succeed but it's not there yet, and not really making progress either.

I suppose whether it's "there" yet depends on your personal needs, but it absolutely is making progress. Maybe slow, but steady and visible.


After a decade of holding on with a small pool of friends with Matrix, we finallly gave up this month over notifications dropping It hurts because I agree in principle - I don't even fully understand why notifications even should need Play Services or whatever Apple does. But after enough missed occasions, we decided it wasn't worth it and reverted to a blend of SMS and Jabber, where the notifications consistently work (on apps that dont use the above). I don't think the Matrix team is taking this seriousy enough. If you miss out on moments over dropped notifications, you or one of your group will fall back to another method and soon enough so will the whole group.


speaking as project lead of Matrix: i’m not aware of a general problem affecting dropped notifs. mine are fine on matrix.org on element x ios for instance. are you using unifiedpush on android on a ntfy server which is rate limiting notifs or something?


Anecdotally, whenever I see someone mention Matrix online, very frequently it’s to complain about it.


The model Session came up with makes sense UX-wise. But I got yelled at for recommending it: something complicated about security, which was way over my head.


Presumably it's just this meeting, filtering down the ranks:

So in late May, Stephen Miller, a top White House aide and the architect of the president’s immigration agenda, addressed a meeting at the headquarters of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, known as ICE. The message was clear: The president, who promised to deport millions of immigrants living in the country illegally, wasn’t pleased. The agency had better step it up.

Gang members and violent criminals, what Trump called the “worst of the worst,” weren’t the sole target of deportations. Federal agents needed to “just go out there and arrest illegal aliens,” Miller told top ICE officials, who had come from across the U.S., according to people familiar with the meeting.

Agents didn’t need to develop target lists of immigrants suspected of being in the U.S. illegally, a longstanding practice, Miller said. Instead, he directed them to target Home Depot, where day laborers typically gather for hire, or 7-Eleven convenience stores. Miller bet that he and a handful of agents could go out on the streets of Washington, D.C., and arrest 30 people right away.

https://www.wsj.com/us-news/protests-los-angeles-immigrants-...


Miller is an excellent, quick witted entertainment and speech writer in his own way. What's astonishing is using what is essentially an entertainer for high level strategy.


> What's astonishing is using what is essentially an entertainer for high level strategy.

I think this makes it even scarier. This means the goal is clearly not establishing sound policy, but to output propaganda that is designed to be easily consumed by TV audiences. It is beyond reality because it is not designed to make sense, it is designed to make sense to TV consumers by feeding on the context they get from their TV tropes. The Mexicans hanging around in Home Depots is a TV cliche that's recognized by people living wel beyond any Home Depot.


People voted for the entertainment. They want to see some brown people getting violence meted out to them. It's the deep sickness of racism all the way up, especially Miller.


Tbf this entire administration is a circus full of entertainers from the top down. It's like these guys are taking notes from a Mexican soap opera, ironically.


People generally hate things that try to steal their attention away from the thing they are trying to focus on.

It doesn't matter if it's a scrolling marquee, an animated gif, some Flash, a movie, a popup, a cookie banner, etc...

Generally, moving/animated things grab your attention and people find it annoying.


I think the article is a bit weird. To commiserate means to empathize with another's suffering, such as the getting dumped by your girlfriend example in the article.

But the article launches (literally the first sentence) into "As people become managers, it’s quite common for their team members to want to commiserate with them." as though it is just obvious that all managers have some sadness that their team members need to help them through, which is obviously nonsense.

So yes, it's unusual phrasing.


The fact that there's two of her.


I'm pretty sure "hey, look what I can use this software to do to my photo" is about as unlikely to fool anyone as you can achieve. It was a tech demo.


It's an article about images that have been manipulated (to fool people).

Photoshop is such a popular tool for image manipulation that it is a verb "to digitally alter (a photograph or other graphic) using image-editing software such as Photoshop".

Inclusion of one of the first ever photoshopped images in a list of famous fake images, even if just a tech demo, seems entirely reasonable.


> Inclusion of one of the first ever photoshopped images in a list of famous fake images, even if just a tech demo, seems entirely reasonable.

I'd argue that the inclusion of one of the first ever photoshopped images which was specifically never intended to fool anyone, and in fact never did fool anyone, doesn't belong in a list of famous fake images that "fooled the world". It would have been far more reasonably presented outside of the list, maybe as a part of the article talking about the history of photo manipulation more generally, but presenting it as one of "28 fake images that fooled the world" doesn't really make much sense.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: