Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | k1t's commentslogin

I think they meant "viable" instead of "available"

Just read the subhead. It explains everything.

Ember’s report outlines how falling battery capital expenditures and improved performance metrics have lowered the levelized cost of storage, making dispatchable solar a competitive, anytime electricity option globally.


I.e. making it a viable option.

Well they are two different words with two different meanings. Both are true in this case. “Available” in the sense “obtainable,” “ready for use,” “suitable for a purpose” or perhaps “available to investors”

Installing cameras to control/monitor your spouse is definitely abusive behavior.


You cant CONTROL someone with observation, you can influence, but you can't control.

If this were true people would act a lot better in public, they do not.


Thank you. Words matter.

I notice most gfs these days resort to "why do I have to..." when upset. Which bothers me because I have never ever said someone MUST do anything.

There are many things a person should do. But almost nothing they actually have to do.


It automatically unlinks the desktop app if you don't open it for 30 days.

There is now at least a reminder on the phone app that will prompt you a few days before one of your desktop apps is about to get unlinked.


I wouldn't call 30 days "a short period of time"...If I hadn't used it for 30days, I'd uninstall it.


The grand jury did not indict in this case.


I feel like the additional unstated context is that nothing has changed.

Power outages are still a common threat, it's just that now they are caused by the power companies under the guise of wildfire prevention.

I don't care if my power goes out because of lack of supply or because you didn't maintain the transmission lines properly - the result is the same - I'm angry.


Shouldn't you control your emotions depending on the reason?


Sure, there might be cases beyond their control - but in general if I pay them to provide a service and they fail to deliver, I think my annoyance is justified.

If they are busy counting their profits instead of focusing on providing a safe, reliable service, then I think it's reasonable to be angry with them.


https://nmsceefax.co.uk/ for a live browser-based example.


I'm surprised this didn't get more traction - hopefully it makes it into the 2nd chance queue


How does the 2nd chance queue work?


Here's dang's explanation: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26998308

Moderators and a small number of reviewers go through old submissions looking for articles that are in the spirit of the site—gratifying intellectual curiosity—and which seem like they might interest the community. These get put into a hopper from which software randomly picks one every so often and lobs it randomly onto the lower part of the front page.


Thanks!


She's not alone - here's an example (from today!) of an HN user using WiFi to mean cellular/mobile data

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45620379


The problem is that the user experience is not "oops, I accidentally flagged an article, I should go unflag it."

The experience is more like "I clicked on a link to an article, but instead of loading the article, the HN page just reloaded. Now I have to scroll down to find it again... Hmm.. Where is it? Maybe it's moved to a different page...? What was I even looking for again? Oh well"



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: